anti hunting

• Assertion/claim
• Those who opose hunting do not realize all the benifits.
• evidence-concrete detail:
• Hunting does a large part in bosting our economy.
• Commentary 1: Just one deer can provide up to fifty pounds of venision, cutting down largly on the cost of food.
• Commentay 2: The taxes, hunting license, and expenses hunters pay average over 480 millions dollars a year.
• evidence-concrete detail:
• Consevation and management are the most important thing to keeping our enviornment healthy.
• For all the taxes hunters pay, there has been more than 200,000 acres of land purchased for wildlife conservation and public hunting.
• The taking of wildlife does the biggest part in management of wildlife, if the populations were not kept in check there would be fewer animals then we have today.
• opposing claims:
• The gun activist in our country argue that if there was no hunting there would be no reason for anyone to own a gun except for the military.
• Although I disagree one hundred percent, people would find a way to get firearms and its not the guns that kill people its people killing people with guns.
• my paragraph:
•                Hunting should never be banned. Hunting in many families in the united states is a big tradition and it feeds many familys through the winter. Just one deer can provide up to fifty pounds or more of venison. Also the hunters pay taxes and expenses to do this sport which brings in an avarage of 480 million dollars a year.                  All hunters are conservation and management experts. If we didnt follow the laws set there wouldnt be anything left to hunt, but since the game and fish commison set forth on making laws all of the species hunted have made a huge come back. Managing game saves many other species also. There is less competion for food and so it allows smaller animals and plants to live.                  Many gun control activists want to outlaw hunting and band all guns from the general public. They say without guns then there would be a lot less vilonce.                I believe that if guns were band that people would still find a way to get them and violence would still occor possibly more. Its in the constition "we have the right to bare arms" and I willalways uphold that right. Hunters do not contribute to the violence caused with guns.

http://www.texashuntfish.com/app/news/20918/Top-5-Benefits-Of-Hunting